Facility Use PoliciesSchools Can Protect Students From Extra-Curricular Groups that Psychologically Harm Students
Implement A Smarter Facility Use PolicyIn the years leading up to and following the Good News Club v. Milford Central School decision, CEF has filed scores of lawsuits — almost all successful — against public schools that denied “equal access” by Good News Club to its facilities and ancillary benefits such as bus transportation and school information distribution programs (e.g., flyers and permission slips).Schools lost those battles (and frequently ended up paying CEF’s attorneys’ fees) because they, or their policies, excluded the Good News Club solely on church-state separation grounds. Public schools with loosely and broadly written facility use policies cannot, under current law, discriminate against after-school clubs merely because they are religious, sectarian, and/or engage in prayer and worship. In a long line of cases, the Supreme Court has consistently held that public educational institutions cannot single out religious organizations for disadvantageous treatment. Facility Use Policies Should Deny Access to Groups that Engage in Psychologically Harmful BehaviorBut schools are not required to give equal access to groups, secular or religious, that shame and intimidatechildren, employ abusive, degrading, and demeaning pedagogy, engage in authoritarian conditioning, intimidate children from engaging in critical thinking, or incite contempt for public school teachers. If a public college “may expect that its students adhere to generally accepted standards of conduct,”1 then surely a public elementary school can expect the same — and more — from outside groups who use the school’s facilities to provide after-school activities or education to its elementary age schoolchildren. Schools that fail to take action to protect their students from such on-campus groups also risk liability. To protect both their students and themselves, school districts can develop religiously and viewpoint neutral facility use policies that protect their students’ psychological well-being.
Disclaimers: Good News Club® is a registered trademark of Child Evangelism Fellowship, Inc. (CEF), headquartered in Warrenton, Missouri. This site is not affiliated or associated with CEF, which can reached at www.cefonline.com. This site is also not affiliated or associated with the book “The Good News Club: the Christian Right’s Stealth Assault on America’s Children” (2012), its author, Katherine Stewart, or its publisher (PublicAffairs).The materials available at this web site are for informational purposes. While it includes some legal commentary, these materials should not be regarded as legal advice.
FN1. Healy v. James, 408 U.S. 169 (1972) (citation omitted).